Home
Filling the THz Gap
Scientific Opportunities
Coherent Synchrotron Radiation
Calculated Flux
Brief Parameter List
Technical Specs:
Optical Functions & Beam Envelopes
Dipole Chamber
Vacuum Chamber
Mirror M1
Sector Layout
Magnet Specs
Power Supplies
RF System
Workshops
Reviews
Publications
IR Ring Team
ALS IR Home
ALS Home
LBNL Home
Privacy and Security Notice
MCMartin@lbl.gov
|
 |
Project Reviews
BESAC 20 year BES Facilities Roadmap
February 22-24, 2003
Rockville, MD
LSCN-GE-04
Here are links to the BESAC subcommittee Agenda, and
its Full Report which
was unanimously accepted by the full BESAC on Feb. 25, 2003.
Section of the report that pertains to CIRCE:
Far Infrared (Terahertz ) Light Source Facilities
There is considerable scientific interest in high power, short-pulse radiation in the
terahertz and far infrared region. This range is important for studying collective
excitations in solids, molecular librations and rotations, protein conformational dynamics,
superconductor bandgaps, and electronic and magnetic scattering. A facility that
provides short pulsed and high average power radiation in this spectral region offers
exciting opportunities for probing fast and ultra-fast chemical, physical and biological
processes.
Two proposals for facilities that would produce terahertz and far infrared coherent
synchrotron radiation in this region were presented. Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory proposed a Coherent Infrared Center (CIRCE) at the ALS. Thomas Jefferson
Laboratory proposed an IR/UV FEL user facility.
While each of these two groups has identified an exciting new potential user
community, it is not yet clear whether the scientific communities that might use these
facilities have embraced this new technology. The BESAC Subcommittee encourages
the DOE to organize national workshops to explore the scientific advantages of research
with terahertz radiation at user facilities. Further the BESAC Subcommittee notes that
some of the parameters of these coherent synchrotron machines are only comparable to
available table-top sources: the energy per pulse, full dc to terahertz coherence, and pulse
durations are not much different. However, there are opportunities for significantly
higher stability and average power in these machines. Some significant technical hurdles
need to be explored more fully. The BESAC Subcommittee noted that trials at BESSY
have explored coherent synchrotron radiation (CSR) instabilities in storage rings, but
have not yet addressed the issue fully. Research to resolve this issue, as well as to
develop the energy recovery technology needed for linac-based sources, must precede
any full-scale commitment to a new facility.
The cost of these new light sources should be relatively modest, partly because
the level of hazard and the amount of shielding required in this wavelength range is far
less than with present sources. Therefore, it should be possible to develop these sources
without the kind of full-scale new facilities requests needed for X-ray or neutron
facilities. The BESAC Subcommittee recommends that issues related to instrument
development and sample environment be more carefully examined to enhance the
likelihood of success in this area. It is also important to more completely document the
science demand for such a national user facility dedicated to this frequency range and to
have the national community assist in deciding the type of facility that best serves its
needs.
IR Ring 1st internal review
March 14, 2002.
Committee Members:
Kem E. Robinson (Chairman), Benedict Feinberg, Robert K. Johnson, Brian M. Kincaid,
Joseph W. Orenstein, Howard A. Padmore, Robert A. Rimmer, Andrzej Wolski,
and Roland B. Yourd
Agenda
| 8:00 am | Breakfast |
| 8:30 am | Executive Section |
| 9:00 am | Welcome and Introduction | D. Robin |
| 9:10 am | Applications for IR Synchrotron Radiation | M. Martin |
| 9:40 am | IR Ring Overview | J. Byrd |
| 10:10 am | Scientific Motivation: Strategy and Plan | M.Martin |
| 10:40 am | Coffee Break |
| 10:55 am | Coherent Mode Studies: Strategy and Plan | J.Byrd |
| 11:25 am | RF Frequency Decision: Strategy and Plan | S.Kwiatkowski |
| 11:50 am | Photon Beam Stability: Strategy and Plan | W.McKinney |
| 12:15 am | Lunch and Executive Section |
| 1:15 pm | Electron Beam Stability: Strategy and Plan | W. Barry |
| 1:40 pm | Acc. Physics High Priority Issues: Strategy and Plan | J.Byrd |
| 2:00 pm | Site Location: A Plan for the Decision | D. Munson and W. Byrne |
| 2:25 pm | Engineering High Priority Issues: Strategy and Plan | W. Thur |
| 2:50 pm | Costs, Schedule and Important Dates | F.Sannibale |
| 3:15 pm | Break |
| 3:30 pm | Executive Section |
| 4:30 pm | Close-out Section | The Committee |
Report of the Comittee:
Full report (PDF)
LSCN-GE-02
Highlights of the report:
- "The group is to be commended for its excellent work in investigating coherence effects. It is a prime example of the quality and value of Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) funding."
- "Emphasis should be focused on the source operating in coherent mode."
- "There should be a concerted effort to ... exploit noise reduction afforded by synchronous detection."
|